热门标签

皇冠APP下载(www.hg108.vip):A day of judicial discretions exercised wisely

时间:2个月前   阅读:18   评论:1

皇冠APP下载www.hg108.vip)是一个开放皇冠即时比分、皇冠官网注册的平台。皇冠注册平台(www.hg108.vip)提供最新皇冠登录,皇冠APP下载包含新皇冠体育代理、会员APP。

THE Federal Court unanimously dismissed Najib Razak’s bid to adduce additional evidence in his final appeal against being convicted of misappropriating funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd.

The five-judge panel led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat ruled that Najib’s application lacked merit as the evidence his defence team claimed to be fresh had no relevance to the former prime minister’s knowledge of the RM42 million, which is the main issue in the SRC International case. 

In all honesty, the decision is not unexpected. The law on the matter is settled. It is entirely at the discretion of the appellate court.

A judicial discretion must be exercised judiciously. This simply means that the discretion must be exercised based on established legal principles.

The principles have been summarised in the judgement of Lord Parker CJ in the English case of R v Parks [1961]:

(i)    the evidence sought to be called must be evidence that was not available at the trial;

(ii)    the evidence must be relevant to the issues;

,

ERC20换TRC20,TRC20换ERC20www.u2u.it)是最高效的ERC20换TRC20,TRC20换ERC20的平台.ERC20 USDT换TRC20 USDT,TRC20 USDT换ERC20 USDT链上匿名完成,手续费低。

,

(iii)   it must be credible evidence in the sense of being capable of belief; and

(iv)   the Court will, after considering the evidence, go on to consider whether there might have been reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to the guilt of the appellant if that evidence had been given together with other evidence at the trial. 

The four conditions or requirements above are cumulative. Based on the Federal Court ruling as reported, Najib had failed the relevancy requirement.

The Federal Court had also unanimously dismissed the request by Najib’s legal team to postpone the hearing of his appeal.

In exercising discretion to refuse or grant an adjournment, the court is entitled to consider the effect of an adjournment on court resources and the competing claims by litigants in other cases awaiting hearing, as well as the interests of the parties.

It has long been recognised by the courts that the resolution of disputes serves the public as a whole, not merely the parties to the proceedings. Adjournments delay final adjudication of cases. Costs are incurred. Therefore, further delays and costs are undesirable.

As the Chief Justice puts it succinctly, justice delayed in the SRC International case is also justice denied to other accused persons. – August 16, 2022.

* Hafiz Hassan reads The Malaysian Insight.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。

上一篇:ug环球代理开户(www.ugbet.us):Tengku Zafrul: Govt committed to strengthen budget 2023 preparation process

下一篇:Telegram怎么搜索群聊:Asian stocks gain as investors weigh risk from Pelosi Taiwan visit

网友评论

  • 2022-12-01 00:12:57

    Hga050www.hg108.vip)是皇冠体育官方信用网线上直营平台。Hga050开放信用网和现金网代理申请、信用网和现金网会员注册、线上充值线上投注、线上提现、皇冠官方APP下载等业务。Hga050提供皇冠官网管理端登录线路、皇冠官网会员端登录线路,皇冠官网手机网址、皇冠官网最新网址导航等服务。评论一下,记得我来过